|
Covered When it
Counts Jeff Morris
In an industry where constant contact with
dangerous electrical equipment is a necessary evil, it
is important to be prepared for every eventuality. One
type of hazard comes in the form of arc fault situations
from breaching between phases or phase to ground, which,
although short in duration, can present some of the
greatest risks to electricians working on energized
equipment.
When an arcing fault occurs it creates intense
energy, which is then released into the space
surrounding the electrical equipment in the form of an
arc flash of extreme heat that can reach upwards of
35,000 degrees Fahrenheit in less than a second. The
arcing fault also creates an arc blast of pressure waves
and sound waves. In addition to the possibility of
burning the person who comes in contact with the arc
flash, the heat that is generated has the potential to
ignite non-flame resistant synthetic clothing, including
polyesters and rayon, or cause the clothing to melt into
skin, resulting in second- and third-degree burns or
even death. The pressure and sound waves from the flash
can also blow eardrums and damage lungs.
To protect against such devastation from arc flash
incidents, OSHA mandates the use of personal protective
equipment (PPE), including protective clothing, though
it does not delineate how best to use it.
Meeting the Standard
Until the year 2000, when the National Fire
Protection Association issued changes to NFPA 70E
"Standard for Electrical
Safety Requirements for Employee Workplaces,"
addressing procedures and recommendations for protecting
against arc flash, there were no specifics on the type
or kind of clothing that should be worn when working in
particular situations where arc flashes could occur.
(NFPA 70E was originally developed in the late 1970s and
published in 1979 to provide guidance for workers to
satisfy compliance with OSHA requirements on electrical
safety.)
The latest edition of NFPA 70E includes requirements
for basic protective clothing and PPE for protection
against arc flash in various categories of electrical
work, based on the risk of arc flash and arc blast at
the worksite.
"Qualified personnel must perform a hazard risk
analysis of each task at the worksite to determine the
level of protection needed," notes Ken Mastrullo, senior
Electrical specialist and staff liaison for NFPA 70E.
"The analysis is the responsibility of the employer."
NFPA provides tables to assist the user in determining
protective schemes. These tables assign hazard risk
categories, 0 to 4, that reflect the amount of energy
that could be generated from an arc flash at particular
distances from the source. The higher the potential
energy is the higher the category and the greater the
required thermal protection capabilities.
 |
|
|
Electricians working within the Flash Protection
Boundary (the limited approach boundary) need to
properly clothe themselves for the hazard risk category.
To assist in that, NFPA 70E includes a second chart that
serves as a personal protective clothing matrix,
indicating the type of clothing and/or the number of
layers to be worn for protection for each risk category.
It also includes the total weight range of the clothing
material for maximum protection and the required minimum
arc rating of PPE calculated in calories per centimeter
squared (cal/cm2), with the calories correlating to the
heat factor and the centimeters reflecting the distance
from the energized part.
Untreated cotton, wool, rayon, silk or blends of
those materials are non-melting flammable materials that
are acceptable for High Risk Category 0, for use up to 2
cal/cm2 incident energy exposure. For higher risk
categories, at least some fire resistant clothing is
required. Protective fire resistant clothing is made up
of one or more layers and has different thicknesses of
material, designed to protect against various exposures.
Arc flash clothing is available, typically, with Arc
Thermal Performance Value (ATPV) from 8-100 cal/cm2.All
the clothing is required to have labeling that states
the arc rating, as well as indicate that the item meets
ASTM F 1506 requirements. "Electricians should wear
clothing that most closely matches need, as long as it
meets or exceeds the exposure. A worker should never
work on energized equipment that has an exposure of over
40 cal/cm2," says Mastrullo.
The clothing protects the worker from an arc
explosion and the resulting heat, but not from
electrical shock. Non-conductive gloves, rated into six
classes based on voltage, protect the wearer from shock.
Editor's Note: Jeff Morris, vice president of
Sales & Marketing for WH Salisbury, is a member of
the American Society for Testing and Materials, the
National Fire Protection Association and IEEE. Salisbury
is the worldwide leader in bringing personal safety to
those who work with electricity. For more information
contact Salisbury at 877.406.4501, http://www.whsalisbury.com/
or at info@whsalisbury.com.
For more information on safety, please read "A Case for
Safer Clothes: Sargent Electric Co."
Other Related
Articles
Don't
Get Burned - Perform Arc-Flash Calculations Electricians
Get High Backgrounder-Emergency
Evacuation Looks
To Live For New
Jersey's Ramapo College Gets High Marks Electrical
Safety Training-Creating a Qualified
Employee NECA
Responds to OSHA's Hearing Conservation
Proposal Key
Interlock Systems NECA
Wins Highest Honor for Public Awareness Campaign
Lightning
Prevention Specialist Saves Auburndale Power $100,000 a
Year Lightning
Protection? Do Those Really Work? University
Has Shocking Plumbing Problem NECA
Releases New Confined Space Safety
Guidelines Updated
NECA "Safety Expert" Software Now Available Myths
and Facts on Complying with NFPA 70E's Clothing
Requirements Shock
Therapy — The Science Of Appliance Testing Defining
Safety Requirements of Tallest Structures Ever
Built Re-inventing
Worker Safety Through Standardization New
Safety Requirements Target Maintenance, Electrical
Workers Reduce
the Risk of Electrocution Extra
Caution Is Essential in Maintenance and
Repa Protecting
the Lifeline of your UPS: The Battery Working
Live is Method of Choice for Line Maintena Ergonomics
Regulations: After Repeal, What Next? Genuine
Ergonomic Hand Tools Reduce Worker Injury Radiofrequency
Energy Safety Electrical
Hazard Analysis Detection
Systems Announces New Fire Panel Design
and Plan Your Lightning Protection System Fire
Protection: 5 Ways to Save Valuable Data and
Effective
Loss Control: The Art of Working Properl Avoid
These 5 Hazards Even When Nobody’s Loo Safety
BASICs: a List of Dos and Don’ts! Interactive
Safety Training on the Internet Gearing
Up for Safety Don't
Take the Fall Why
Making Good Connections Is Important Reducing
Risk to People and Property If
It’s Not Grounded, It’s Not Dead! OSHA
Is Watching Out For You Penetrating
And Maintaining Fire Walls Electrical
Safety In The Workplace Grounding
Techniques Arc
Hazards: Life Threatening But Preventable Cold-Related
Stress Disorders Silicosis:
Are Your Contractors Exposed To This Fa Minimize
Arc-Burning Incidents Thermal
Runaway: Why Checking For Tight Wiring Con The
Voluntary Protection Program: OSHAÆs Gold
Meda Safety Preventing
Electric Shock: Locking Out a Covered
When it Counts OSHA—The
Problem or the Solution? Job
Site Foreman Take Responsibility Electrical
Safety Keeping
Safety in Check with Protective Gear Arc-Flash
Hazard Analysis Arc
Flash: A Critical Safety Issue for Electrical
Contractors Cable
Support System Keeps Texas County Offices
Tangle-free Training
for a Lifetime A
Case for Safer Clothes: Sargent Electric
Co.
|